Some Problems with Daycare for Under 3’s
1: The inherent problem with institutional group care for under 3's:
group care means constant changes of staff.
In group settings employers fight to keep staff by improving
conditions, but every concession to adult needs reduces fulfillment
of childrens'.
Split-shifts to cover the long nursery day reduce adult hours
by doubling the number of people with whom babies must interact.
Lunch breaks, sick leave, vacations and in-service training
courses, produce such constant staff movement that case studies
suggest an average of seven different people a day and fifteen
a week (some of them strangers "filling in") handling
each child.
A baby that’s in that kind of care is in a situation where
he’s being cared for by somebody who even if she was there
yesterday, because it wasn’t her day off, doesn’t know what
happened to that child in the twelve hours that he’s been
at home. Now when a child is growing and changing and developing
and working very hard at particular areas of his development,
even twelve hours can put you totally out of step. Caring
for a baby non-continuously is a continual process of experiment.
And it may not hurt the baby for one afternoon, but it’s awful
bad for babies if all of their infant lives they are having
to communicate with people to whom their language is foreign.
Penelope Leach
2: Why Under 3’s need the same people all the time:
Babies
do not only need constant care, they also need consistent
care. Consistent care does not necessarily, or even optimally,
mean from one single person all the time. Only in Western
industrialized societies is a baby ever assumed to be the
responsibility of his mother alone; everywhere else he gets
primary care from his mother and subsidiary care from a whole
range of other people including older siblings, grandparents
and neighbours.
But however many people care for a baby, they do need to be
the same people all the time. Many babies start life with
the special people who are usually their parents but then,
when emotional attachment, feelings of effectiveness and communication
have begun to develop, find themselves with strangers. Depending
on his age and maturity and his previous experiences, such
a baby will have developed a wide range of more or less subtle
cues and he will be beginning to have expectations about people’s
responses to them. Having those cues missed or misinterpreted,
or receiving responses which are new to him or out of line
with anything he knows, will shake his confidence. But he
is still a survivor. If the strangers are part- or full-time
substitute parents who, once on the scene, remain constantly
part of his life, he will gradually adapt. If his mother is
around to help him make the transition, to ‘translate him’
for the newcomers and to blend their ‘style’ with her own,
he will adapt more quickly. The new people will be made ‘special’.
He will teach them to understand him and to respond to him
just as he taught his mother. But if the newcomers to his
life have no time to ‘listen’ to him, concentrate on him,
feel their way with him, perhaps because he is now part of
a group or perhaps because they are part of a stream of short-term
caretakers, his development may truly suffer... (Penelope
Leach)
3: Why Under 3’s need a whole caretaker all to themselves:
Individual
carers are better placed to meet babies needs.
They have only one child of any particular age and stage to
cope with and this is vital. When you cope with two or three
at once, there is no way you can simultaneously respond to
messages about milk, cuddles, and dropped toys. (ask anyone
who has triplets.)
That is not something our present society readily acknowledges,
though. After all, one-to-one care by someone outside the
family offers no economies of scale. If it releases anyone
to fill the skill-shortage it does so only by leaving babies
with less-skilled - or at least less well paid adults, an
uncomfortably colonialist thought.
So acknowledgment of babies needs for individual care would
mean admitting that where a parent wanted to be at home with
a child, s/he was the obvious caregiver and should be economically
supported in that choice. (Penelope Leach)
Penelope Leach gained her doctorate in Social Psychology
for a study of the effects of different sorts of upbringing
on children’s developing moral judgments and social sense.
She worked on juvenile delinquency for the Home Office and
became a Research Fellow under the Medical Research Council,
conducting a large scale study of the effects of babies on
their parents. Her book Babyhood established her reputation
as an authority on infant development. Her world bestseller
Baby and Child put child development into the context of the
realities of childcare. Its continuing sales in twenty-nine
languages approach two million. Her book The Parents’ A to
Z is being used by the World Health Organization as the basis
for its planned World Encyclopedia of Childcare.
4: What infant mental health professionals PRIVATELY think is the best care for children up to age three
a graph that will surprise you
5: Daycare for under 3’s makes breastfeeding difficult or impossible.
"The Canadian Paediatric Society recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life for healthy, term infants. Breast milk is the optimal food for infants, and breastfeeding may continue for up to two years and beyond."
The
American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that: "breastfeeding
continue for at least 12 months and thereafter for as long as
mutually desired."
6: Adults who have the capacity to care for others are made not born.
The capacities basic to caring are empathy and trust – capacities
established or not in the first three years through secure
attachment to (optimally) the mother.
Further, the capacity to form long-term meaningful mutually
satisfying relationships is the basis for stable familial
relationships for the rearing of the next generation. First
Three Years — Next Three Generations
Daycare for under 3’s
puts the development of these capacities at risk.
Attachment expresses a psychobiological attunement between a mother (or primary caregiver) and child. Over the first 18 months of life mother-child interactions indelibly influence the evolution of brain structures responsible for social and emotional functioning for the rest of the life span. Brain development in general, and the maturation of the prefrontal cortex in particular, take place after birth through this emotional exchange. It appears that the mother is actually the external regulator of her child's biochemistry. Verbal exchange, but especially nonverbal emotional communication via affect (or feeling) is intimately linked with internal neurochemical and neurobiological development. (Shore, 1994, p.7).
A mother is actually the hidden regulator of her infant's endocrine and nervous systems. ... the mother induces changes in emotional state in her infant, and in doing so directly influences the infant's learning of how, how much, and whether to feel. ... The link between the internal physiological world of the infant and the internal physiological world of the mother, ... paves the way for all later relationships ... In addition, maternal behaviour is thought to be significant in mediating genetic influences, many of which are dependent on transactions within the child's environment. (Bloom, 1997)
Excerpted from: Etiology of Aggressive Antisocial Behaviour:
Four Key Developmental Factors by Carole Hood Ph.D. in Youth
Update, Spring 2003
7: The early learning that is important for under 3’s is learning trust, empathy and affection through secure attachment - ideally - to mother. This is crucially different from the advanced cognitive early learning seen in some daycare children.
In 2002, the NICHD Network reported in American Educational Research Journal (39, 133-164) that, although higher quality childcare was associated with better cognitive performance at four and a half years, the more time during these years that these children had spent in any type of non-maternal childcare, regardless of its quality, the more assertiveness, disobedience and aggression they showed with adults, both in kindergarten and at home.
The Minnesota Longitudinal Studies show that … the quality of early attachment experiences have particular importance with regard to the intimacy, trust, and other emotional aspects of both teenage and adult relationships, and the capacity for successful partnerships in adult life. Moreover, children and teens with secure attachment histories excel in social and emotional health, leadership skills, morality, social behavior, self-reliance, self-control and resiliency, as appropriate in each stage of development.
Is Humanity Fatally Successful?
8: The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Study of Early Childcare has shown:
(1) that the more time children spend in any of a variety of
nonmaternal care arrangements across the first 4.5 years of
life, the more aggression, disobedience, and conflict with adults
they manifest at 54 months of age and in kindergarten;
(2) that these seemingly adverse effects remain even after taking
into account multiple features of children’s families, as well
as the quality and type of nonmaternal care which children experienced;
and
(3) that more time in care predicts not just more assertive
or independent behavior, but more truly aggressive and disobedient
behavior, as well...
See The Dangers of Day Care by Jay Belsky
The Wall Street Journal, 16 July 2003
Professor Belsky is director of the Institute for the Study
of Children, Families and Social Issues, Birkbeck University
of London, and has been a collaborating investigator on the
NICHD Study of Early Child Care since its inception in 1989.
9: "NICHD studies also found that when children spent more time in childcare, their mothers displayed less sensitivity when interacting with them at 6, 15, 24, and 36 months of age. Sensitive, responsive mothering through the early years was the best predictor of social competence at six years, which in turn predicts schooling success." Excerpted from Mothering Matters by Dr. Peter Cook
(Dr. Cook is the author of the book "Early Childcare - Infants and Nations at Risk." Published by News Weekly Books, Melbourne)
10: Consumerism
It is consumerism that drives the 80 hour work week.
Consumerism: The World's Fastest Growing Religion
The desire for daycare for under 3’s is a by-product of consumerism.
Mothers and fathers are programmed to believe they need the
money a mother can earn during the three years her child needs
her most.
This in one of the richest countries of the world.
We should not supporting a level of consumption that poses
risks to new human beings.
How
can it be that in the United States, the richest society this
planet has ever known, families cannot afford the division
of labor of home and working life that is simply taken for
granted in even the poorest societies?
Going back to the early 1970s ... official figures from the
Household Expenditure Survey in Britain show ... average weekly
household expenditure on the essentials — housing, fuel, food
and clothing — was roughly the same as today (at constant
prices ... $ 92.50 then compared to $ 100 now). Housing costs
have risen, but the price of food and clothing has fallen.
What
has changed is the extent of our spending on luxury goods,
childcare, leisure and vacations abroad — expenditures on
these categories have more than doubled during that period
(from $34.38 to $73.13). And automobile expenses too have
nearly doubled during the same period...
James Tooley The Miseducation of Women
Proportion of Average Family Income Spent on Food, Shelter
and Clothing
LICO Level is for a family of four in 1993 dollars, urban
centres of 500,000 plus
1959
Proportion - 50 percent
LICO Level - $19,123
1969
Proportion - 42 percent
LICO Level - $24,870
1978
Proportion - 38.5 percent
LICO Level - $28,243
1986
Proportion - 36.2 percent
LICO Level - $30,645
1992
Proportion - 34.7 percent
LICO Level - $31,007
Source: Statistics Canada, Income distributions by size in
Canada, (Cat. 13-207 various issues)
11: Extensive non-parental care in infancy is without long-term precedent in humans or any other mammals.
The
major environmental changes involved in this massive social
experiment should have some kind of “environmental impact
assessment”. The burden of proof that such changes in the
early environment of infants are safe should be on those who
advocate them, just as the purveyors of other environmental
changes, like additives to food or water, must provide evidence
that. they are safe for human consumption. As in medicine,
the precautionary principle of primum non nocere – “first
and foremost do no harm” – should apply. This principle is
not being applied in polices which advocate more child care
for infants and young children.
Dr. Peter Cook M.B.,Ch.B (NZ), F.R.A.N.Z.C.P., M.R.C. Psych.
(Lond.), D.C.H.
12: It is a blatant denial of social justice to put under 3’s in daycare.
The concept of justice – public justice, social justice includes
some notion of protection for the weaker members of society
and should be like a guiding principle for all our policies,
a system that recognizes inalienable rights and adheres to what
is fair and honest.
What are we to think of a social justice that ignores the wishes
and welfare of those who:
1. cannot speak for themselves
2. cannot hire a lawyer to speak for them
3. cannot form a group or union to press for their interests.
4. cannot run away or escape the situation they are in
How often would infants and toddlers choose to go to a daycare
centre rather than be with mom?
We get away with it because we're bigger - otherwise known as
bully behaviour (complete with rationalizations of course)
Some Additional Sources of Information
On
the Internet:
“This website contains an
extensive index of publications about daycare from well-known
child development authorities, psychologists, psychiatrists,
pediatricians, public policy analysts, sociologists, daycare
providers, and others.
“Although this website's hundreds of pages of information about
daycare is primarily organized by date, it can easily be searched
by author, subject, title, etc.
“This collection of day care information seeks to counterbalance
the relentless pressure placed upon parents to abandon their
children to these impersonal institutions.”
The Problem with Day Care -- A very thorough review of daycare problems, but not easily available.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3458/is_199805/ai_n8234421
Books:
Day
Care Deception: what the child care establishment isn’t telling
us
Brian C. Robertson ©2003
http://www.amazon.com/Day-Care-Deception-Establishment-Telling/dp/1893554678
Early
Childcare - Infants and Nations at Risk -- Dr. Peter
Cook http://www.newsweekly.com.au/books/0646292994.html
Home-Alone America: The Hidden Toll
of Day Care, Behavioral Drugs, and Other Parent Substitutes
- Mary Eberstadt ©2004
http://www.amazon.com/Home-Alone-America-Hidden-Behavioral-Substitutes/dp/1595230041
7 Myths of Working Mothers - Why Children
and (Most) Careers just Don’t Mix - Suzanne Venker ©2004
http://www.amazon.com/Myths-Working-Mothers-Children-Careers/dp/1890626538
